On 4 May 2021 the Danish Parliament adopted a new piece of legislation introducing a mechanism to screen and approve certain foreign investments into Denmark as well as special economic agreements that Danish enterprises enter into with foreign companies.
The new rules fundamentally change the Danish approach to foreign investments, as we go from an almost completely open economy to now having one of the most restrictive regimes for screening foreign investments yet implemented by any EU member state.
Within a range of critical sectors Denmark now introduces a statutory approval system, where the foreign enterprise – to the extent it acquires direct or indirect possession of or control over at least 10 per cent of ownership or voting rights or similar control by other means – will before completing such a transaction need to have it approved by the Danish Business Authority.
The new rules enter into force on 1 July 2021 but will not be applied to transactions that complete before 1 September 2021.
The critical sectors that the statutory approval systems apply to are very broadly defined. Below is a non-exhaustive list of critical sectors, a list that will remain open dynamic interpretation:
- IT and cyber security
- Processing of sensitive data
- Dual-use products
- Critical infrastructure (energy, transport, water, health, communication, media, data processing, data storage, aviation, space, defence, infrastructure related to elections, financial infrastructure, sensitive facilities and real estate necessary to operate the above)
- Other critical technologies (which itself extends far and comprises AI, robotics, 3D print, semi-conductors, cyber security, aviation, space, defence, energy storage, quantum technology, nuclear technology, nanotechnology, biotech)
- Freedom and pluralism of media institutions
- Supply of critical raw material, e.g. energy and food
It is a fairly straightforward exercise to determine if someone acquires a 10 per cent share of ownership or voting rights in a Danish enterprise, but whether similar control is established again leaves much room open for interpretation. The preparatory notes to the legislation mention for instance director appointment and veto rights, covenants in long-term loan agreements and asset acquisitions as transaction types where it will be relevant to assess if similar control is acquired.
Furthermore, the statutory approval system applies to a foreigner’s greenfield establishment in a critical sector in Denmark. Control may also indirectly shift where a division operating within a critical sector and where a Danish company is embedded downstream in the group structure is sold to a foreign enterprise.
Where a Danish business operating in a critical sector enters into a special economic agreement (defined as an agreement that confers control or significant influence over the Danish entity onto the foreigner) with a foreign player this also is subject to approval.
The examples of such agreements offered by the Danish government in the legislative drafting notes also extends quite far:
- R&D collaboration
- Public private partnerships
- Operational, service and/or supply agreement (if implying control or significant influence on management, financial, development and/or operational matters)
- Agreements implying long-term commitments and/or causes difficulties in substituting supplier
A feature of the new Danish rules that has been criticized by local business organizations is that the statutory approval regime also applies to investments made by EU and OECD headquartered businesses. In order for the free flow of services in the EU not to be adversely impacted, special economic agreements are however allowed with “true” EU companies.
It must be noted, however, that in determining whether a company is a foreigner or (with regard to the special economic agreements) a “true” EU company, you need to look at the ultimate owners. If a foreigner controls 25 per cent or more of a Danish entity it is a foreigner in the eyes of the Danish FDI rules. Consequently, if a Swedish entity for instance owns a 30 per cent stake in a Danish company the Danish company is deemed to be a foreigner. Conversely, if a British entity owns a 30 per cent stake in a German business, the German business is not a “true” EU entity.
Another matter of concern is that no thresholds apply at this stage, albeit such may be established in the implementation of the rules. In consequence, no monetary threshold applies to the value of transactions to which the rules apply as well as a company that earns only a small percentage of its revenue on a critical sector line of business is nevertheless defined as a critical sector company.
Below we have attempted to create an illustrative list of the types of transactions that – if they relate to a Danish business in the mentioned areas of business or another critical sector line of business – were not previously subject to any restrictions but will from now own need to be approved:
- A Danish enterprise where a Swedish PE fund owns a 30 per cent stake wants to buy another Danish business earning 15 per cent of its revenue on the development of robots.
- A Danish start-up that develops AI solutions needs growth capital and finds an investor in the UK that offers to inject EUR 0.5 million against a 12 per cent ownership interest. The result would be the same in case of a convertible loan if the UK investor thereby acquire rights similar to a 10 per cent ownership interest, e.g. through tough loan covenants, veto rights and/or a right to appoint a director.
- A German company wants to set up a Danish company and employ personal to pursue the development of energy storage solutions.
- A Danish university wants to engage in an R&D collaboration with a US company in order to co-develop space related technology (if that entails control or significant influence for the US partner).
- A Danish developer of nanotechnology wants to enter into a joint venture with a Japanese company.
- A Danish company that develops cyber-security solutions enters into an outsourcing agreement with a Korean enterprise (if that entails control or significant influence for the Korean supplier)
- A Mexican company wants to sell a division that contains a Danish biotech company to a Canadian buyer (it being noted that in the later stages of the legislative process is was clarified that intra-group reorganisations where a Danish entity shifts owner might be carved out from the statutory approval regime).
- A bank consortium with 50 per cent Danish and 50 percent foreign banks offers M&A transaction finance (with covenants conveying significant influence on financial matters onto the bank) to a Danish company for the purpose of its acquisition of another Danish company in the defence industry.
- A Dane living in Switzerland wants to use his Swiss entity to inject funding into his brother’s business that develops infrastructure solutions to the financial sector.
The obligation to apply for approval rests with the foreign company and gun-jumping is not allowed: i.e. you cannot proceed without approval. The Danish authorities have been given a wide range of measures to counter transactions proceeding without approval, including suspension of voting rights on shares, expropriation of assets and that special economic agreements that have not be properly approved are null and void.
The Danish authorities will have 60 days to review an application but can “stop the clock” in case of applications not containing the necessary information or in case of a delay in the case processing period.
Whereas Denmark can only reject or attach conditions to an approval in case of a transaction presenting a threat to national security or public order (why we expect most cases to pass through), the very tightly knitted net cast out by Denmark will in our view create a need to apply for approval in a very highly volume of FDI cases.
The Danish authorities have already initiated the work on 4 implementing regulations and guidance notes (within the areas of the application of the rules, procedural issues, confidentiality and collaboration, respectively). These will have a significant influence on how FDIs are dealt with in practice, and hopefully they will provide additional clarity and contain appropriate caveats so as to avoid a material adverse impact on foreign investment appetite.
The new FDI rules are in Denmark supplemented by another legislative initiative focusing on enhanced security requirements for agreements concerning critical telecom infrastructure that are also expected to enter into force on 1 July 2021. At EU level FDI issues are also continuing to attract attention, and today the Danish EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager is introducing a proposal for EU rules seeking to restrict M&A transactions and public tender bids by foreign state-owned entities as well as entities that have received state-aid.
Magnusson’s International M&A team covers the entire Nordic and Baltic region, and we have experts in each jurisdiction ready to offer advice on the status of FDI screening systems in each of our geographies.
As FDI screening regimes are introduced more widely across the global landscape this will impact M&A transactions and add significant complexity, especially as rules implemented locally, including across the EU, are not uniform. Banks offering to finance M&A transactions and insurers offering W&I insurance products will also increasingly need to verify that the deals they finance and/or insure do not contravene FDI screening regimes.
We are hosting webinars for lawyers from foreign law firms on 12 May 2021 starting at 9am CET and 4pm CET where further details of the Danish FDI regime will be discussed. To sign up please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
We will also follow-up with a newsletter release and a webinar as soon as we have seen how the Danish authorities propose to implement the new legislation.
If you have questions about the new Danish FDI regime, please do not hesitate to get in touch with us:
M&A: Magnusson Denmark assists the buyers with the...
Membership in Finnish-Lithuanian Chamber of Commer...
Magnusson advised the shareholders of Contribyte O...
The acquisition of Kirami Oy by Harvia Plc
Start-ups, consultants, adhoc’ers and volunteers –...
PRC Legal Update: Autonomous Driving
Magnusson Finland advised medicine manufacturer Sa...
Magnusson once again ranked amongst top advisors i...
The Acquisition of QSC Group Oy by Kotikatu Group...
Invitation To Webinar About New Danish Foreign Inv...